Pages

Showing posts with label Film club. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Film club. Show all posts

Saturday, 1 March 2014

FIlm Club - Disney goes 'Frozen'




Like most of my friends I have been a Disney fan since childhood. I remember watching the Lion King and Aladdin in the cinema, replaying the VHS of Aristocats until it neared breaking point and singing along to the Little Mermaid. The whole family would watch Christmas specials featuring snippets from all the classics, and I adored the Donald Duck & CO shorts (not to mention collected the magazines). 

But then something happened. Since around Finding Nemo times (the Pixar + Disney into the sea epic of 2003) a change was evident. Great stories were still being told, and great success was had on the early teen front (I'm looking at you Hannah Montana and High School Musical) but it was a while ago since that magic took me away to another world and truly sparkled. So when Frozen came along I felt more hesitant then excited.  


Thursday, 6 February 2014

Film Club - American Hustle


So in the spirit of Oscar-nods season, I've started to work through the contenders. First out, it's all about the costumes, hustle and some extraordinary character interpretations.  




Sunday, 19 January 2014

Film/TV Club: Dexter, season one catchup




Been doing a lot of Netflix-catchup:ing lately. When I was younger the excuse of missing great TV shows/episodes due to work and general lack of time-availability seemed like a cheap one. However, these days I sympathise deeply.

Having fallen just short of my TV priorities over the past couple of years I decided it was time. Breaking Bad and Dexter were going to get watched start to finish and that was that. 


It's been two weeks and we're on season four of Breaking Bad. I just finished season one of Dexter. You can probably sense which show won the popularity contest at home. Nonetheless, I wanted to take a moment to properly review each one, starting with Dexter. 


Dexter first aired on Showtime (USA) back in 2006, and ran for a total of eight season (always rewarding as it means you are watching towards an already written and filmed finish, rather than a long wait for the next season post the last available cliff-hanger). 

Based loosely on the novel 'Darkly Dreaming Dexter' (2004) and following series of books written by Jeff Lindsay, it was adapted to season one for TV by James Manos Jr (wrote the pilot, has also previously received writing credits for The Sopranos and The Shield etc). 

The show follows Dexter Morgan (played by the as usually brilliant Michael C Hall), a blood spatter pattern analyst for the Miami Police Dept on one hand and a perfectionist serial killer targeting only the guilty but not convicted on the other. He views himself as void of all the usual emotional and empathic resources of most normal people, but his sense of right and wrong (however extreme and crossing of moral lines) instilled by his adopted father (a former cop) adds a strong layer of humanity and sympathy to his character. Despite this latter bit often being considered by himself an act to fit in without raising suspicion, which again makes you question those sympathies in favour of the creepy and calculated. 


It is, frankly, a brilliant basic idea. Balancing the good and the bad, the viewer sympathising with and to some degree trying to understand the logic of a character who is (and acknowledges this with no hesitation or attempt at easing his guilt) at the end of the day both a cop and a killer. A man without the ability to really empathise with others but with a sense of right and wrong as he only pursues those guilty of a crime (a sense that tests him in the finale and eventually proves he isn't just a straightforward cold emotionless avenger but his loyalties could actually be... dare we say it. Feelings?). 


Michael C Hall plays the character with just the right amount of likableness, humour, honesty and a dose of creepy due to the many moral dilemmas. Then again I've always thoroughly enjoyed his performances,  in particular as a fan of Six Feet Under. 


Playing his girlfriend, traumatised by an abusive previous relationship and trying to provide a safe and stable home for her two kids, is Julie Benz (for all Buffy and Angel fans better known as Darla the Vampire, but she's been incredibly busy since then). She puts in a nice performance balancing the frailty of Rita's character with her motherly determination and strength and a love for Dexter that would see none of the dark sides. 


However, that's where the goodness stops, rather abruptly. Other supporting characters includes Dexter's adoptive sister Deb (Jennifer Carpenter, also Hall's real life wife and ex-wife during the course of the show's run) and his co-worker cops. Episode one is forgiven for the teething issues and slightly overly-excited performances but sadly I found these continued throughout the season. 


Even the finale, written full of suspense, cliff hangers and intrigue, lost it's way turning almost spoofy or comical whenever Carpenter, Erik King (Sgt Doakes) or Velez (Lt LaGuerta) hit the screen. Extreme reaction, decision making that is questionable and rash at best without serving the story in a realistic manner, acting that goes so overboard I found myself cringing repeatedly... 

The cleverness of Dexter's central storyline falters with the rest of the ensemble trying and failing to fit in and catch up, and Benz's Rita seems to be the only one who can hold their own in a strong scene against Hall. 


Yes, I did want to get to the end and see what happens and I will keep watching as I hear Julia Stiles will be joining at some point and given that it has reached cult status there must be a reason for this beyond a clever idea. Then again judging from the mostly negative google news' titles all questing the last season and the finale (no spoilers read, just very general reviews) maybe a strong lead and a clever moral dilemma really was the only thing that saw it through.


Still, perhaps season two brings a stronger team effort allowing the main story line to shine a bit, I will get back to you on that with another review in the near future. For now though, it's Breaking Bad time all the way!

For season one's score I'm going to go with two out of five kittens (close call to one and a half).


xo



















Sunday, 29 December 2013

Book Club Three-way Special- Gone Girl, Sharp Objects & Dark Places


Book club time! 

This week I thought a review of the UK spring/summer hit 'Gone Girl' by Gillian Flynn (originally published 1st January 2012) was long over-due. 


I devoured the book after recommendations from multiple sources and spotting it in Waterstones too many times. Funny how that works isn't it, what's suddenly the trendy read and everyone seems to be carrying a copy? But more on that another time. 

'Gone Girl' follows the story of a missing persons case, from the perspective of the missing woman's husband as well as what appears to be diary entries of the wife. In (what I would soon discover is) usual Gillian Flynn fashion the story twists and turns, toying with the lines of right and wrong, light and dark, choices and lack thereof. 


The husband is portrayed in a bluntly honest manner when we are reading his POV. He isn't particularly likeable nor does he try to be, but he isn't downright un-relatable or un-likeable either and so the reader forms an oddly attached relationship with him. 

We want to know more, even though we are constantly held back a bit by theories of what might have happened, that nagging feeling something isn't right as we constantly wait for the hint of what the twist will be. Is he an innocent man searching for his wife? Did he play a part in her disappearance? Who is she, really? 

Truth and fiction within the story mix in a clever and cunning manner, and as this was my first time reading a Flynn book I wasn't expecting the mind games. 

It's a thoroughly enjoyable read, and while the very end may feel a bit out there and, in fact, slightly drawn out, the book is addictive and keeps your mind constantly occupied and your emotional investment in the story high. The ability to write the unlikable main character well, and keep us both entertained and, dare I say it, rooting for him despite the many times we are also confronted with his moral shortcomings and the very real possibility he might be involved...   

People are scary creatures. They are un-expected and their motivation not always clear or particularly logical. Abusing this fact to the fullest Flynn carves out the details of her characters and their flaws, and when the twists start coming (some expected, some not) it's both enjoyable and disturbing. 

Which brings us nicely onto her other two hits, 'Dark Places' and 'Sharp Objects'. 

As mentioned, once you've read a Flynn book you may start to expect a few re-occurring elements. After Gone Girl I was so thrilled to have found an author whose writing I thoroughly enjoyed and that made me almost miss tube stops while devouring the pages, so naturally I quickly Kindle-downloaded everything she'd published so far. 
Dark Places (Published 2009) follows Libby Day, the sole survivor of a disturbing massacre in a small rural Kansas (fictional) town. As the only witness of the murder of her sisters and mother she, as a child, testifies and sends her brother to jail for the deeds. All while the press have a field day blaming Satanic Cult worshipping, with the side effect of making Libby a bit of a cult survival story in some circles. The book starts up twenty five years later, with Libby's financial situation forcing her to confront the possibility of her brother's innocence after being offered money to assist an amateur investigator group. They are convinced there was more to the story, and Libby, while initially motivated solely by hard cash, is soon stumbling across facts that seem to insist there was a chance she could have helped put an innocent man in jail. 

Again I quickly realised that the main character was far from a charmer. Everything about her leaves you feeling a bit unsure. She threads a fine line between deserving of sympathy for her past traumas and testing your loyalty and belief in her truth and decisions. Yet you root for her, from start to finish. You care. You fear. You wonder. 

The story features a variety of questionable characters all with their own motives and secrets, some quite dark and shocking. But throughout you are also faced with the horrifying pieces of memories from Libby as she both tries to recall the real events she saw that terrible night long ago and battle the desire to never have to think about it again. The perspective challenges the readers' own morals as to how crimes compare and how truths and perceptions can be so deceiving, all while pushing the story onwards. 

In many ways I actually found this book both far darker than Gone Girl and the ending a bit less extravagant (perhaps the wrong word, feel free to replace with something more appropriate... Un-realistic despite it's extremeness almost giving it some realism?). But perhaps that's due to the entire storyline being so un-apologetically and shockingly... Brutal. 

Again it was an enjoyable and challenging read, and I struggled to stop thinking about it each time I put the book down. 


So naturally that led me straight to 'Sharp Objects' (published 2006, yes I seem to have managed to read her collection backwards). In hindsight there are some tells this is the first story, perhaps just my own perception but there is a sense of testing boundaries and careful application of the character portrayals here whereas the others are bolder (although that's not to say this isn't equally dark and testing of the readers psyche, nor that they are necessarily better. It's a brilliant read, all the same darkness but perhaps more exquisite and carefully structured) and expansions of the same themes. 

We follow Camille Preaker, a reporter who has escaped her small-town troubled past for the big city. Trouble at her paper, however, demands a scoop and her editor assigns her to cover the murder of a little girl in her once home-town. But going back proves testing both for Camille and her family whom she returns to stay with. She clashes with her pristine and and oddly removed mother, is missing a common ground with her young half-sister, and faces a community that is offering quick solutions and easy fixes to a horrific crime as a way to deal with the grief. At the same time her own demons shine through the words etched in her skin from years of self-harming. Wicked, Girl, Nasty, Harmful, Whore... Trailing a mix of truth, lies and memories she fights the battle to uncover what really happened to two little girls (judged already by the community around them) while keeping herself from getting lost in her inner battles and confusing flashbacks. 

Again it's a detective read, there's a case to solve and the details are sketchy and contradictory. All players have their own motives, sometimes unclear and often questionable, and the truth is just out of reach. 

Camille shares many qualities with the later main characters, in fact in some ways she's the first in the evolving line of the same themed protagonist. Each character shares a number of qualities. They view themselves as a bit damaged, they appear a bit guarded or closed off in some ways, they may be coming from the right or the good place but to the world some actions still come across as questionable. Etc etc.

Camille is a bit anti-social, male attention and sex is blunt and guarded, means to an itch scratching end and feelings to be shoved away. The risks of opening up to pain, the walls between herself and those who seem to care... Her fragile and often disturbingly eerie relationship to her mother. She's an intricate puzzle and we slowly uncover the history behind her reality. 

And while you start to have an inkling for the ending about half-way, the suspense and the unravelling keeps you hooked and entertained (and slightly un-easy) from start to finish. Top read, and I highly recommend it (although unlike me perhaps best to start with this one). 

All Gillian Flynn's books demand your attention. The stories hold the reader in a relentless grasp, each page a new challenge and with ten new questions to be answered while carelessly toying with your existing theories. That's the key, writing that keeps the reader wanting more through each twist and turn.

What did you guys think, anyone get so hooked they just had to go through all three? And if so what were your faves? 

I have to say Dark Places stands out for me personally. There's something so challenging and uncomfortable while the character balances the right and wrong, likeable for genuine vs for sympathetic reasons repeatedly. But all three were enjoyable reads. You can say what you like about the reality of the twists but we are in the fiction world. Equally, the daily news seems to report far wilder realities fairly often (sadly) these days so... 

For the Flynn-verse I give a solid five cute kittens (I know, and this is based in the enjoyable ness and addictiveness of her writing - the storylines do vary in quality and I admit the similarities between the themes and twists make it slightly easier at the third book to follow Flynn's imagination reaching the right answers just a bit quicker). 



On a side note, both Gone Girl (film rights bought by Reese Witherspoon's production company & 20th Century Fox, who knew!) which will be directed by David Fincher (Fight Club, The Social Network, House of Cards to name a few) and Dark Places (with Gilles Paquet-Brenner directing) have not just been green-lit as films but are cast and heading to releases in 2014 (September for Dark Places and October for Gone Girl, which seems both a bit odd and slightly brilliant in a way to have them competing almost straight after each other). Sharp Objects is also in the works (not much detail on release plans at the moment but with Sarah Michelle Gellar attached as Camille), produced by Jason Blum (Paranormal Activity). 



Flynn herself is slated for the screenplays for all (busy bee) which is promising enough, so I am very excited to see what the results will be. The cast looks solid for all and Fincher is always responsible for intriguing and dedicated filmmaking (100 takes anyone?). 

xo

Disclaimer: None of the above photos are my own and I take no credits for those appearing in this post, all through google images and linked articles. 





Saturday, 28 December 2013

Film Club - Kick Ass 2





Sequels rarely top the original, although in some cases they take a new route and work almost just as well. On very few occasions they improve. In the case of Kick Ass 2 they, sadly, did not. That's not to say it was a bad movie, in fact it was a fairly enjoyable experience with a few jokes. But it also fell short of expectation. 

So for the plot then... Kick Ass (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), aka Dave the teenager who started the regular-people-don-superhero-costumes trend, appears to have found a fellow and trainer in Hit Girl (Chloe Grace Mortez), Mindy, who we saw last in the first movie after they defeated Red Mists father while suffering some losses themselves. However, Hit Girl's promise to her new guardian, Marcus, and in honour of her late Big Daddy, to hang up her hero costume leaves Kick Ass to find a hero-team of his own. So he stumbles upon Justice Forever, led by a a disguised Jim Carey working under the alter-ego Colonel Stars and Stripes. With a few screws loose but a decent heart he steers the group of good hearted costumed heroes to take on the bad guys in their own ways. 



At the same time Chris (Christopher Mintz-Plasse) , last seen as Red Mist, has taken a turn and decided his fate was never as a hero but as a super villain and starts assembling a super league of evils (Mother Russia to name one) to take on Kick Ass himself. 



While Kick Ass the first was a hilarious comedy with just the right mix of growing pains jokes, super-hero references and fresh faces, the sequel seems to try a bit too hard to grow up while and retain the laughs while balancing some serious story lines and gory fight-scenes. 



It lost some of it's charm from trying just a little bit too hard to be just a few too many things it didn't have to be. Sometimes it's a comedy that hits all the right spots. Sometimes it mixes Mean Girl with a fresh heroine. At times we go full Marvel with the villain league slashing and cutting, fairly epic and hilarious costumage. The story delves into deeper issues too, confronting grief, bullying, self-confidence, loyalty, right and wrongs, violence and much more. These are all important and work on their own. The moment stars and stripes explains his gun-wielding ways for example. 

But again, all this is where the film struggles for balance. It started out as a comedy, with a sprinkle of seriousness and a lot of heart. That worked well. The elements don't flow as smoothly in the sequel even though the heart is in all the right places. It just seems to take on too much, and to follow through on each front as well. It almost works too, but...  


The characters are funny, and there's something quite interesting and amusing about Hit-Girl facing the stereotypes and high-school horrors of the Queen Bitch & Co and expectations of gal's her age. The greater discussion of good and bad, right and wrong, and the ordinary Joe standing up for the little guy, are mixed up with a nice dose of humour. But something feels out of place. A little like having mixed in Superbad, Spiderman and some horror while retaining the Kick Ass element. The overall storyline of Red Mist turning bad guy, while Kick Ass and Hit Girl try to find their identities (teen or superhero, and what lies in between), work nicely. But there are a lot of scenes, a lot of elements, and a lot of strings that get lost. It tries too hard to do too many things at once, with quality in most bits but leaving the audience a bit lost and at risk of loosing focus at times. 



All in all it's a three out of five cute kittens. Lots of fun jokes, but not quite going all the way. And despite the holes, I have to agree with much of the Twitter-verse... A third in the series would definitely go down well in the fan base, and I would look forward to seeing what they could come up with. At the same time, it does feel like a good wrap. Then a lot of sequels do, until the third one is written up. 














Friday, 20 December 2013

Film Club - Anchorman 2

Anchorman 2 - The Legend Continues


Director: 
Adam McKay (Anchorman, Step Brothers, The Other Guys)
Writers: 
Adam McKay & Will Ferrell (if you don't know what he's famous for, study hard and fast now!) 





Best moment: The surreal yet epic final showdown in the Park & too many other to count. 

Worst moment: Too little Brick (Carrell) and Chani (Wiig) time!!



On Wednesday the 18th November the legend officially continued in the UK, as Anchorman 2 premiered for the public. 




Ron Burgundy (Will Ferrell) is back, having initially swapped Classy San Diego for New York city. After loosing out on a significant promotion to wifey Veronica Corningstone (Christina Applegate) and facing a fairly brutal sacking instead (featuring Han Solo... Uhm... I mean Harrison Ford as Mack Harken), Ron is offered a chance to re-unite the old news team (Steve Carrell, Paul Rudd and David Koechner) and anchor at ground-breaking starter-network GNN, 24/7 news. 






Hilarity, inappropriateness, booze, dolphins, bonding with sharks, extreme news, extreme ice skating, sexism, extreme fighting in the city, vending machine dating, racism, most things ending with -ism, bat-eating and quite a few others follow.

Where a lot of comedies these days tend to fall too far in the extreme traps (Two and a half men, The Interns, Bachelorette), giving up on originality and sticking to repeated sex/fart/basic jokes, Ron and the gang get the balance quite right. 

To get vaguely serious for a moment as well, the non-PC jokes somehow work just right, pulled off by characters that get to represent so many (mostly contradictory) stereotypes that instead of adding to the -isms manages to ridicule them into obvious pointlessness. We laugh not to agree with the problem, but because the whole thing turns into a bit of a satire of those who genuinely stand for and believe in such old-fashioned ignorance and prejudice. 

As director Adam McKay puts it, "Ron is just so dumb and clueless that he comes off as innocent"  which results in a mix of hilarity and an opportunity to highlight of some important issues relevant to the -80s (and today). 




This gang of talent includes the some of the top layer of the current comedic epicness cake in the US. They come together perfectly, pushing each other just right and keeping the audience in chuckles throughout. And it isn't just the regulars; the guest-list is quite impressive. 

Kristen Wiig's role against Steve Carrell's 'Brick' is perfection ("This is the nicest vending machine anyone's ever taken me to.")*. Amy Poehler and Tina Fey pop by (!!), Kanye West shows up and... Well while you can stalk up IMDB for the rest it's worth holding off just for the pure enjoyment of discovering some of the surprises in the grand finale. 



Brick: "I can always guess how many jelly beans are in a jelly bean jar, even if I'm wrong."


While there are some slower scenes there is a constant smile on the audience lips. We all knew what we came for, and Ron and the gang delivered. It doesn't feel too long or in any way forced, even though there are chapters I would have liked to see feature more over some other scenes. You can tell the original cut was a 4 hour fun-fest. But the brutal shortening doesn't loose too much and still holds your attention throughout, mixing reality with pushing the boundaries of crazy and randomness without loosing itself too much along the way (This is the End, I'm looking at you!).

Is it better than number one? Well, I will always have a soft spot for the original, but it's certainly not a bad sequel. Thoroughly enjoyable (the entire party was up for many repeat watchings to come), so I'm going to have to say...

Four and 1/2 out of Five Cute Kittens 


 1/2

*quote off memory, don't judge if not word for word accurate!



As it's been a rocky road for this little gem to reach our theatres, here's a little background... 

The first film was a DreamWorks release, but their catalogue was acquired by Paramount Pictures in 2006. There was a lot of back and forth about a potential Anchorman 2 with talks getting serious back in 2008. At this point Carrell, Rudd and Ferrell all agreed to pay cuts in order to get the movie made, but in 2010 despite all the budget cut options Paramount turned down the plans. 



Fortunately for all of us though Paramount had a change of heart and by 2012 there was a solid green light on the project. Ferrell announced the good news in full Burgundy get up at a talk show. 

Originally the cut was 4.5 hours long, but while the producers were big fans they decided a 2 hr movie was a more realistic offering to the fans. There is also a lot of ad-libbing going on in this film, with the cast taking it to the next level. 

Another fun fact? During the screenings of the film, Seth Rogen attended a few and single handedly ruined the laugh track due to his loud, distinct and hard giggles.

After this rumours, on-set guest star spotting, and general extreme excitement has been surrounding the project with the release this November, nine years after the original. 

What did you guys think, did it live up to the original? What was the best/worst moments?


xo



Monday, 16 December 2013

Book (and Film) Club - World War Z


Book Club - World War Z




Written by Max Brooks (also author of The Zombie Survival Guide and The Zombie Survival Guide: Recorded Attacks) and published back in 2006, World War Z is a refreshing take on the Zombie Apocalypse storyline.

His version is a collection of interviews with survivors of the Great Panic, set many years after both the outbreaks and the desperate early stages of the war. These snippets become pieces of a puzzle leaving the reader to fill the gaps, and telling the story of this (fictional) significant period in the human history in a surprisingly realistic manner. 


Looking beyond the gore and the medical questions of the 'living dead' Brooks tells the story through interviews with everyone from political and military leaders to every day Joe's, the humane reaction, the disbelief that cost some and the early reactions that saved others. The hard decisions and the human spirit, showcasing the good and bad. 


This is not a book I would have voluntarily picked up, but fortunately one of my girls gave it as a part of a birthday present. 

It only takes a few pages and the hook is in, after that you won't want to put it down until the last interview. There's gore, of course, but nothing too uncomfortable and it all remains relevant to the story. 

While the 'reporter'/'author' is never known in any sense beyond his function as interviewer, something about his questions and pursuit of a full account of the 'Z' chapter does keep the reader invested not only in understanding more of the story but also in a rather abstract manner in him/her.

In many ways the author seems to have created a piece that should read much like a historical collection. It was a surreal reminder of reading old Historical accounts through everything from court documents (cross examinations from Ancient Athens anyone?) to letters or even real interviews from war-times through the times. So all in all, a most enjoyable read. 

Four out of Five cute kittens







Film Club - World War Z

The main reason I was sceptical about the book (based purely on the trailer not appealing to me personally, not because it appeared to lack in film-goodness). 





The film, starring Brad Pitt and directed by Marc Foster (Machine Gun Preacher, Quantum of Solace, The Kite Runner, Finding Neverland, Monster's Ball), is loosley based on the book with references to similar events but with enough striking differences that it tells a whole new story.

Firstly, for some background, Plan B Entertainment (co-founded by Pitt, Aniston and Gardner but now solely owned by the film's lead) secured the film rights back in -07, a year after the book's publication. It went through multiple re-writes, with the first script coming from Michael Carnahan (Lions for Lamb, State of Play). The shoot, starting in 2011 at a $125 million budget, was rumoured to be less than smooth, and the slated 2012 December release was pushed. 

Damon Lindelof (Lost (TV), Cowboys & Alients, Star Trek: Into the Darkness) tried to rewrite the third act but due to time constraints the new script was finished by Drew Goddard (Lost, Angel, Buffy the Vampire Slayer (all TV), Cloverfield). 

It premiered in June 2013, grossing $540 million making it a box office hit with mostly positive reviews. 

As a stand-alone film it's another take on the Zombie-theme. The ideas mix with the book's storyline but step away in some significant ways (such as the Zombie's behaviours and infection process, as well as the hunt for a potential vaccine/cure). 



We follow Pitt's character from when the outbreak booms in the states. A former UN employee, important enough to warrant extraction and safety for his family, he finds himself part of the core group sent out to find either patient X or enough information to understand/cure/vaccinate the escalating Zombie plague.

It does provide action and entertainment, with the classic leading character struggling between service/finding a real solution and trying to keep his family safe. Pitt is his usual strong stellar self, but there isn't too much awe-inspiring content to work with. A big plus is the focus on human reaction and the chase and action over gore and guts.


It was an enjoyable watch with the occasional sudden-scares. Having read the book (as usual) did mean the differences started to annoy me early on but as soon as you accept they are two very different stories on a similar theme it is an entertaining weekend watch. 

It doesn't blow any minds or tingle the senses all that much, but then again it's an action movie with big (but not all too annoyingly extravagant) explosions about a Zombie outbreak that never needs to pretend to be anything beyond that.

Three out of Five cute kittens 



xo