#SheBelongs
1921
“… the Council feel impelled to
express their strong opinion that the game of football is quite unsuitable for females and ought not to be encouraged.”
The FA
2015
“A lot of people think football
isn't for girls. Until now.”
The FA
Both
official English Football Association statements, ninety-four years apart. The
former, minutes from the meeting which resulted in a ban against female
football that would come to last for fifty years.
So
that’s progress, right?
2015.
The Lionesses have finished third place in the FIFA Women’s World Cup, securing
the best finish of an English national football team since the men won a
home-turf gold in 1966. As the team makes their way home, the FA greet the
women with the following tweet:
A
gentle reminded that whilst the times have changed these women still have to
be, first and foremost, defined by these classic labels just in case there is
too much confusion in just celebrating their achievements as football players.
Now,
don’t get me wrong. We are all daughters, sons, and in some instances also
mothers, fathers, partners, etc, and these are all badges to be cherished and
worn with pride. But if it had been the men’s team returning home with bronze
medals around their necks, would anyone have even thought to congratulate their
sporting legacy by reminding them of their everyday roles?
Comparatively,
as the USA team won the gold, President Obama tweeted the following:
Heroes
of the pitch they are, on many levels. So naturally, and in particular with
consideration to England’s long history of football pride and obsession, they
ought to have been a prime focus in the media coverage.
Surely
a few front covers? News bulletins galore? Headlines? Pages of coverage, maybe
a few posters too, as we can all guarantee would have happened if this was
Brazil 2014. No?
Saturday’s
match finished late, and understandably a lot of papers missed the printing
deadline but put up bulletins online instead. Fair enough. Come Monday I found
myself scouring the sports pages only to spot a blurb here, maybe almost half a
page there (mostly filled by a picture and a minor write up) if lucky… Nothing
particularly inspiring, not to mentioned that there wasn’t even a single
mention of the fact that the US ladies team had won the World Cup.
So
what DID the Women’s World Cup look like in 2015?
- This was the seventh
world cup for women (the men are looking forward to their 21st).
- The Lionesses
performance is the second best by an English side EVER (beaten only by the
1966 men’s home gold).
- The USA National
Women’s Team won their third World Cup Gold (1991, 1999, 2015).
- This is the first Women’s World Cup where all matches will be broadcast in the UK – either on the primary BBC channels or via the red button. They also took great care to ensure no one might be misled into accidentally tuning in when expecting the men’s team:
Viewership
- The 2015 Women’s
World Cup Final had 20.3 MILLION VIEWERS in the US (Fox Sports) alone, who
saw USA beat Japan 5-2.
- In 1999 the Women’s
World Cup final (USA v China) had 18 million viewers. The previous record.
- This
season’s men’s FA Cup winners will secure £1.8m in prize money. The women
who lift the trophy will net £5,000.
- The semi-final
between the USA and Germany scored 8.4 million viewers in the US, making
this the most watched FIFA World Cup Semi for either women or men
on record in the country.
- 9.3 million Japanese
viewers tuned in to Fuji TV for the semifinal against England. That’s just
below the 9.8 million that watched Japan win the trophy four years ago on
the same channel.
- 1.7 million watched
the Lionesses in the same semi final match in England on BBC1.
- 21,483 fans sat in
the Stadium to watch England beat Germany in the fight for third place.
- FOX Sports (USA)
devoted 200 hours of programming to the Women’s World Cup, and the six USA
matches averaged 5.3 million viewers.
- The audience for the
women’s World Cup was ca 38% female.
Money
Talks
- Wayne Rooney earns more in two weeks than the entire England ladies’ squad does in a year.
- The 2015 Women’s
World Cup winner receives $2M in cash from FIFA.
- The German men’s
team received $35M when they won the World Cup in Brazil, 2014.
- Comparatively FIFA spent $24m on a feature film about itself called ‘United Passions’.
- This was the only ever World Cup played on artificial turf, and the teams threatened FIFA with a lawsuit claiming the decision was gender based discrimination. FIFA claimed artificial grass is the (cheaper) future. No plans have yet, however, been put forward to replicate this with the men’s cup.
- This season’s men’s FA Cup winners will secure £1.8m in prize money. The women who lift the trophy will net £5,000.
So
what does the achievement by the Lionesses really mean, and what impact if any
can we expect from the above?
I
remember vividly following the 2003 World Cup where my native Sweden was to secure
a silver finish (heartbreakingly, for myself, Germany beat them to the gold).
As the
ladies returned I made my way to Stockholm’s central park with my girlfriends,
finding a space in the crowd that seemed to contain the entire city’s
population and cheering as the women made their way onstage, medals proudly on
display.
There
was nothing in that atmosphere that suggested their achievement was somehow
less than if they had been male players. National pride kicked in and men,
women, boys and girls alike sang and clapped and cheered. I’ll never forget
that.
Equally
I’ll never forget that time an audience member shouted out that we ‘ran like
girls’ during a football match. Or the time a coach asked that we vacate our
training pitch because the men’s team had to get some proper practice in. Or
when someone gently suggested that it ‘isn’t really a girls sport’ and ‘how
about volleyball?’
Never
underestimate the power of what children grow up seeing and hearing. Give them
equal role models, on equal playing fields, met by equal respect, and they will
come to not only expect but demand the same treatment for themselves and their
peers as adults.
That
doesn’t just stop at equality between the sexes, but crosses boundaries across
the board.
However, show them the opposite and you shouldn't be surprised at what
they grow up believing each other (in) capable of.
Give a
young boy the chance to cheer Toni Duggan as well as Steven Gerrard, and give a
young girl the chance to wear both Suarez and Carli Lloyd’s jerseys with equal
pride. No lame jokes. No suggestions. Just performance, passion, the game…
I
remember the pride I felt at walking to practice in a Mia Hamm jersey, with a
WUSA football under my arm. It matters. Seeing role models that you can
identify with growing up makes a huge difference. I loved watching Real
Madrid’s men’s team play. And I had posters of Hamm and Ljungberg on my walls
as well. Seeing both sides putting on fantastic performances, actually seeing
that on my TV screen, made me believe that if they could, if they were
‘allowed’, so could I. And so could any of my friends, boys or girls.
In the
USA the audience got behind their girls, with increased viewing figures and
vocal online support before each game. Celebrities, politicians, everyday sport
fans, news anchors… Everyone was involved, and vocal. Men, women, boys and
girls. Very few people seemed to care that they where female players – this was
the chance at a US world cup win! End of story.
Some
of the UK based male football stars got in on the action too, showing their
refreshing support for the Lionesses.
And
what a show we were treated to. Football at its best. Passion, fighting spirit,
team work, brilliant technique, strong hearts. It has nothing to do with your
reproductive organs. It’s a sport for anyone and everyone who loves to play.
End. Of. Story.
Progress is being made, but it's far from enough and nowhere near quick enough. The disappointment at the lack of exposure and headlines about the Lionesses fantastic achievement was disheartening, but equally seeing the slight increase in support visible online and through viewing figures... That shows there's both an audience and a bright future for the game.
Oh,
and for the record. In 1921 the Dick Kerr’s Ladies Team played to a live
audience of 53,000 at Everton’s Goodison park (with a further 10,000 stuck outside as they reportedly could not fit into the stadium).
In
2014 the average men’s Premier League match attendance figure was ca 32,000 and
Everton’s highest recorded attendance throughout the 14/15 season was 39,000.
Imagine
where the women’s game in England would have been without that 1921-71 ban that
followed?
xo
P
No comments:
Post a Comment